Adoption Network Law Center Adoption Network Law Center
Click Here to be helped in California!
Adoption Network Law Center
Adoption Network Law Center
Pregnant? Click Here
Adoption Network Law Center
China Adoption Blog

08/29/07

Disturbing daddies.

Posted by : grant in China Adoption Blog at 06:42 am , 337 words, 206 views  
Categories: Critical Theory
I made this out of a wikipedia picture. People talk a lot about the conspicuousness of families formed by transracial adoption. There's no way around it - people always notice you. The white dad with the Asian kids. Sidelong glances at the playground. Furrowed brows at the cash register. It's something one has to get used to in this situation, parent and (moreso) child. So how about when the curious gaze comes from a camera wielded by someone who knows how to make an image that lasts longer than the barely noticeable sidelong glance?

The outstanding Harlow's Monkey blog brings our focus onto some subtly disturbing images of fathers and daughters, in a series of photographs that teeter perilously close to the lurid. Or maybe just topple right over the line. One can't help but wonder what the models feel about the finished products. They're well-composed portraits, beautifully colored, and holy be-[expletive deleted] is THAT what people see when they look at us? Older white man, young Asian girl... you can make the equation.

SPONSOR

And now you, like me, can feel icky for a while.

And then there's the dad in China who's just "helped" his 8-year-old daughter run 2,200 miles, from Hainan to Beijing. That's a marathon and a half every day for a little less than two months. She's too young to compete in the 2008 Olympics, but maybe in 2016.

Perhaps it's just that she's an enthusiastic athlete, like he says.

The problem is - with both these stories - that the daughters aren't really speaking freely. We can't know what they're feeling, really. Not for years. Which makes it rather difficult to know that one is doing the right thing. What's the best way to deal with the sidelong glance and the furrowed brow? I imagine it varies from child to child, or, more properly, from small person to small person - and it's something that's awfully hard to talk about until it's simply too late.



----

For information/instructions on how to subscribe FREE to your favorite AdoptionBlogs, please visit this link.

Comments, Pingbacks:

Comment from: bugmenot [Member] Email
The pictures are staged so that they look creepy. Swap out the Asian girls with Grade-A, all-American WASPy girls and the reaction would be similar.

Beyond that, my problem with the photos is they are lighted horribly and the saturation has been jacked-up through the roof. The artist looks to be using a single camera-mounted flash for his light source. The flash power is too high which is why the faces are -- and much of the foreground is -- blown-out. The lighting is nearly as unnatural as the poses. If that was his intent, well, I guess he did all right. Otherwise, he needs a bit more practice. The bad lighting is distracting from the subject matter.
PermalinkPermalink 08/29/07 @ 07:31
Comment from: Sunbonnet Sue [Member] Email
ick. my daughter (24 years old) and I (her forty something mom) get similar glances when we walk along holding hands. folks love to assume the worst sometimes.
PermalinkPermalink 08/29/07 @ 08:03
Comment from: xinpheld [Member] Email · http://xinpheld.googlepages.com/home
I think the bad lighting was purposeful, to give that hint of depravity, a sheen of hidden-in-the-basement over what would otherwise be just shots of dads with their daughters in pretty places. It seems obvious that those photos were chosen out of I assume a large lot for their odde facial expressions and untoward-seeming poses, which I'm sure are just incidental and frozen in time, out of context. It's shameful abuse of photography, if you ask me, and an abuse of the relationship between father and adoped daughter. Isn't the process hard enough without stuff like this?
PermalinkPermalink 08/29/07 @ 08:15
Comment from: xinpheld [Member] Email · http://xinpheld.googlepages.com/home
On a side note- am I seeing things or does there seem to be a trend of similarity in the facial features of daughter and father? I know children tend to copy the faces that their parents make, but I wonder how much of it can be attributed to the secret, 'magic' adoption matching system the CCAA uses. More than once, someone has commented on how our daughter, who's (presumed) from Jiangxi, 'looks like' one or both of us, and she's only been with us for 2 years in July. Has anyone looked into this phenomenon? Am I just seeing things on assumtion?
PermalinkPermalink 08/29/07 @ 08:21
Comment from: bugmenot [Member] Email
I wouldn't go so far as to say a shameful abuse of photography. Mostly, it was just of poor technical quality with the subject matter pushing the art as opposed to the art pushing the subject matter.

If you want to see a shameful abuse of photography -- and one I wish I had thought of first -- check out Jill Greenberg's 'End Times' series of photos...

http://www.paulkopeikingallery.com/artists/greenberg/exhibitions/endtimes/

Pure genius!

(Greenberg's work has an over-processed feel, making the End Times series seem comic book like. While I generally don't like that effect, it works in this case and was very well done technically speaking.)
PermalinkPermalink 08/29/07 @ 09:23
Comment from: miriam [Member] Email · http://www.growingjwards.blogspot.com
The Greenburgs are really well executed. There was a huge bruhaha over whether she was abusive to induce these feelings (which the parents did by momentarily withdrawing a lollypop) in her subjects. Y'know, because toddlers so rarely melt down in photo shoots anyway...

These "Daddy and I" (Shouldn't it be "Daddy and Me"?) are just ugly.

xinpheld said: "I think the bad lighting was purposeful, to give that hint of depravity," and I would second that, adding that we can imagine the types of images that inspired this exploiter. The low, knee-level angles make every girl's dress look inappropriate. He must have coached the hand placement- this would be very easy to create.

I honestly had not thought of that kind of criticism, Grant. I hope you don't let this get under your skin much. It's bull.
PermalinkPermalink 08/29/07 @ 13:45
Comment from: trixie belle [Member] Email
The photographer is a woman, by the way, bugmenot--just sos ya know--a Chinese born woman. I have been reading the blogs where folks have been discussing the smarminess of this series and it strikes me as interesting that a lot of people assume the series was shot by a man (a white man maybe? I dunno). Curious huh? I am thinking this detail is relevant when contemplating creative intent.
PermalinkPermalink 08/29/07 @ 14:59
Comment from: bugmenot [Member] Email
Trixie, I used 'him' and 'he' as generic pronouns and not to mean one specific gender. I did see the artist's name and assumed the name to be Asian but didn't internally assign a gender. Truthfully, male or female didn't register. I'm still hung up on the overblown saturation of the photos.
PermalinkPermalink 08/29/07 @ 15:41
Leave a Comment: You need to login to leave comments.:

Login | Register

Login To AdoptionBlogs.com

Search

Sponsors

   

Misc

Subscribe to China Adoption Blog

 Enter your email address:
 

 

Who's Online?

  • Guest Users: 468